| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
devtool doesn't quite behave right when a recipe has patches applied in overrides, so
add a test case to exercise that behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This will drop them md5sums from recipes that still have them,
and will not re-add them for recipes where they're already
removed.
[RP: Added fix for the test recipe]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
There was a regression in this functionality that went unnoticed
due to lack of tests.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
And fix the reported upstream check failures.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
acinclude.m4 is about to be removed from the lzo recipe which breaks
test_devtool_update_recipe_local_files_2. Create a synthetic recipe in
meta-selftest with some local files and use that instead.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
So that they're reported correctly when checking 'universe' for
latest upstream versions.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
These recipes should be excluded from target 'world' because these are
just intended to be used internally by oe-selftest (devtool, recipetool, etc.)
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If you have a file:// entry in SRC_URI with a subdir= parameter that
makes it extract into the source tree, then when you update that file in
oe-local-files and run devtool update-recipe then you want the original
file to be updated. This was made to work by OE-Core commit
9069fef5dad5a873c8a8f720f7bcbc7625556309 together with
31f1bbad248c36a8c86dde4ff57ce42efc664082, however until now there was no
oe-selftest test to verify it.
Note that in order to succeed this test also requires the fix
"lib/oe/recipeutils: ignore archives by default in
get_recipe_local_files()" since the test recipe uses a local tarball.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
It is possible to use gzip or bzip2 to compress patches and still refer
to them in compressed form in the SRC_URI value within a recipe. If you
run "devtool modify" on such a recipe, make changes to the commit for
the patch and then run devtool update-recipe, we need to correctly
associate the commit back to the compressed patch file and re-compress
the patch, neither of which we were doing previously.
Additionally, add an oe-selftest test to ensure this doesn't regress in
future.
Fixes [YOCTO #8278].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Add a test to ensure devtool update-recipe works properly on recipes
that contain only local files (since the other tests we have didn't test
that).
Relates to [YOCTO #10563].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Add a test for devtool upgrade with a recipe pointing to a git
repository, since this uses several different code paths.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
* Use a more real-world test of a recipe pointing to a remote file
* The cleanup tracking / teardown commands need to be added towards the
top, or they won't have the desired effect of cleaning up if the test
fails.
* Check that a versioned subdirectory gets renamed to match the new
version
* Ensure the recipe contents gets changed as we expect it to
* Check that the recipe directory is deleted by devtool reset at the end
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Upgrades a recipe to a particular version and downloads the source code
into a folder. User can avoid patching the source code.
These are the general steps of the upgrade function:
- Extract current recipe source code into srctree and create a branch
- Extract upgrade recipe source code into srctree and rebase with
previous branch. In case the rebase is not correctly applied, source
code will not be deleted, so user correct the patches
- Creates the new recipe under the workspace
[YOCTO #7642]
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
Ross Burton
Martin Jansa
Alexander Kanavin
Alexander Kanavin
Paul Eggleton
Leonardo Sandoval