path: root/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd
diff options
authorElizabeth Flanagan <>2011-12-03 15:48:29 -0800
committerRichard Purdie <>2011-12-08 15:23:49 +0000
commit3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e (patch)
tree85967d32dd9c02d410739d782b6a4e500a5e0702 /meta/recipes-extended/xinetd
parent558b5043e1d5a36caff137093fd04abcf025af1c (diff)
OECore license fixes: meta/*
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas: - LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked - LICENSE field has a license with no version - LICENSE field was actually incorrect - LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional SPDXLICENSEMAP entries. HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front. For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see: That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package. Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-extended/xinetd')
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/
index 159cb2cf26..26ba78f36c 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/
@@ -2,11 +2,12 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Highly configurable, modular and secure inetd"
# xinetd is a BSD-like license
-LICENSE = "xinetd"
+# Apple and Gentoo say BSD here.
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYRIGHT;md5=8ad8615198542444f84d28a6cf226dd8"
-PR ="r0"
+PR ="r1"
SRC_URI = "${PV}.tar.gz \
file://xinetd.init \