From 16c27f3bb7b99193a88949eb85f3a3da725f3a6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ross Burton Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 20:17:58 +0200 Subject: util-linux: refresh patches The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- .../recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux/configure-sbindir.patch | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux/configure-sbindir.patch b/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux/configure-sbindir.patch index a5b1ff12e5..e475289f65 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux/configure-sbindir.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux/configure-sbindir.patch @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell Signed-off-by: Saul Wold