diff options
| author |   Klaus Schwarzkopf <schwarzkopf@sensortherm.de> | 2010-12-05 13:18:47 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com> | 2010-12-09 21:53:10 +0100 |
| commit | 157adffd31ea5cb79bdf823402c87cea94bf0501 (patch) | |
| tree | 1b9b9a79f6a58ef802fbeffda1b8def18c4a98ba | |
| parent | 8c56bc9a03bea6877eb81b9584fbf9ed9b45910f (diff) | |
| download | openembedded-157adffd31ea5cb79bdf823402c87cea94bf0501.tar.gz | |
asterisk_1.2.24: Set correct Checksum
Tilghman Lesher <tlesher@digium.com> wrote on asterisk-users@lists.digium.com:
Due to a licensing issue with some of the files we distributed with previous
tarballs, we removed those files from archived tarballs in order to avoid
continuing to distribute those files in any form. So yes, the checksums
will have changed, although the checksums we distribute with the tarballs
were also updated at the same time.
Given that most of the changes since 1.2.24 have been security fixes, I
would strongly encourage you to update your packages. There is no excuse
for distributing vulnerable packages beyond the date that the vulnerability
is disclosed, plus a brief period necessary for releasing updated packages.
Additionally, the 1.2 branch has been EOLed, which means if any additional
security issues are found, we will not be releasing updated packages to
deal with those issues. For this reason, you would be better off putting
forth the work to release packages based upon 1.4 or 1.8.
Signed-off-by: Klaus Schwarzkopf <schwarzkopf@sensortherm.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | recipes/asterisk/asterisk_1.2.24.bb | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/recipes/asterisk/asterisk_1.2.24.bb b/recipes/asterisk/asterisk_1.2.24.bb index fb2fd4b832..0db2b70117 100644 --- a/recipes/asterisk/asterisk_1.2.24.bb +++ b/recipes/asterisk/asterisk_1.2.24.bb @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${libdir}/asterisk/modules/.debug" FILES_${PN}-dbg += "/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/.debug" -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "63dc8b7be4cd10375c5fbda893c780bc" -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "9debaf410636fa477e1e1f09fe0b16a1c2814afaf7195f34f29e4ce5b8debbbd" -# CHECKSUMS.INI MISMATCH: I've got this instead: -#SRC_URI[md5sum] = "db7bcaaa494804af361157a37c224dfa" -#SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "eed3493b1409d7100e0f983af0486bd7f8965e9e47b7a6d5ab8539b2dd3609aa" +#SRC_URI[md5sum] = "63dc8b7be4cd10375c5fbda893c780bc" +#SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "9debaf410636fa477e1e1f09fe0b16a1c2814afaf7195f34f29e4ce5b8debbbd" + +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "db7bcaaa494804af361157a37c224dfa" +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "eed3493b1409d7100e0f983af0486bd7f8965e9e47b7a6d5ab8539b2dd3609aa" |