| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Use Tinfoil.parse_recipe_file() and Tinfoil.parse_recipe() instead of
the recipeutils equivalents, and replace any local duplicate
implementations. This not only tidies up the code but also allows these
calls to work in memres mode.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
setup_tinfoil() already calls prepare(), we don't need to call it again
ourselves and doing so with tinfoil2 results in "ERROR: Only one copy of
bitbake should be run against a build directory". Calling prepare()
twice should probably still be allowed, so that ought to be fixed
separately, but in the mean time this code is still wrong so fix it
here.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
In previous implementation, a UnicodeDecodeError exception will be
raised if multi-byte encoded characters are printed by the subprocess.
As an example, the following command will fail in an en_US.UTF-8
environment because wget quotes its saving destination with '‘'(0xE2
0x80 0x98), while just the first byte is provided for decoding:
devtool add recipe http://example.com/source.tar.xz
The patch fixes the issue by avoiding such kind of incomplete decoding.
Signed-off-by: Jiajie Hu <jiajie.hu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The hello-mod recipe is unusual in that it has only local files in
SRC_URI and builds these out of ${WORKDIR}. When you use devtool modify
on it, devtool puts all of those files in an "oe-local-files"
subdirectory of the source tree, which is not ${S} (or ${B}) any more
and thus building the recipe afterwards fails. It's a bit of a hack, but
symlink the files in oe-local-files into the source tree (and commit the
symlinks with an ignored commit so that the repo is clean) to work
around the problem. We only do this at time of extraction, so any files
added to or removed from oe-local-files after that won't be handled, but
I think there's a limit to how far we should go to support these kinds
of recipes - ultimately they are anomalies.
I initially tried a hacky workaround where I set effectively set B =
"${WORKDIR}" and that allowed it to build, but other things such as the
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM checks still broke because they expected to find files
in ${S}. Another hack where I set the sourcetree to point to the
oe-local-files subdirectory works for hello-mod but not for makedevs
since whilst that is similar, unlike hello-mod it does in fact have
files in the source tree (since it has a patch that adds COPYING) and
thus the same issue occurred.
Also tweak one of the tests that tries devtool modify / update-recipe on
the makedevs recipe to try building it since that would have caught this
issue.
Fixes [YOCTO #10616].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If you have a patch remotely fetched in a recipe (e.g. from an http
server) that needs updating then add a local version and substitute the
entry in SRC_URI to point to it.
One can argue about how desirable it is to be modifying patches fetched
in this way, but then one can argue about how desirable it is to have
such patches in the recipe in the first place - and in any case if
devtool update-recipe is to correctly transfer changes to such patches
made in the git repository within the source tree to the recipe then
there isn't much choice but to do it this way.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
It is possible to use gzip or bzip2 to compress patches and still refer
to them in compressed form in the SRC_URI value within a recipe. If you
run "devtool modify" on such a recipe, make changes to the commit for
the patch and then run devtool update-recipe, we need to correctly
associate the commit back to the compressed patch file and re-compress
the patch, neither of which we were doing previously.
Additionally, add an oe-selftest test to ensure this doesn't regress in
future.
Fixes [YOCTO #8278].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
As of the move to Python 3 and the fixes we applied at that time,
bb.process.run() will return a byte array of length 0 rather than an
empty string if the output is empty. That may be a bug that we should
fix, but for now it's easiest to just check the result here before
treating it as a string. This fixes running "devtool update-recipe" or
"devtool finish" on a recipe which has no source tree, for example
initramfs-framework.
Fixes [YOCTO #10563].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
When you run devtool add on a source tree we attempt to figure out the
correct name and version for the recipe. However, despite our best
efforts, sometimes the name and/or version we come up with isn't
correct, and the only way to remedy that up until now was to reset the
recipe, delete the source tree and start again, specifying the name this
time. To avoid this slightly painful procedure, add a "rename"
subcommand that lets you rename the recipe and/or change the version.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If you run devtool finish to move a recipe created in the workspace by
devtool add or devtool upgrade to a layer, and that layer is not
currently included in bblayers.conf (perhaps unintentionally), then the
recipe will no longer be visible to bitbake. In this scenario, show a
warning so that the user isn't surprised by the recipe "going missing".
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If devtool finish is run on a recipe where the recipe file itself is in
the workspace (e.g. where devtool add / devtool upgrade has been used)
and the specified destination layer is not in bblayers.conf, then we
need to avoid running bitbake -c clean at the end because the recipe has
been moved, but the bbappend is still present in the workspace layer at
that point and so if we do it will fail due to the dangling bbappend.
It's difficult to do the clean at the point we'd want to because tinfoil
is holding bitbake.lock for most of the time, but in any case cleaning
the recipe is less important than it used to be since we started
managing the sysroot contents more strictly, so just disable cleaning
under these circumstances to avoid the problem.
Fixes [YOCTO #10484].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
When running devtool add, instead of hiding the recipetool create
output, change it so that it's appropriate to show in the devtool
context and show it in real-time. This means that you get status output
such as when a URL is being fetched (though currently no progress
information.) recipetool create now has a hidden --devtool option to
enable this display mode.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The new runqemu script assumes that if OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT is set then
it shouldn't try to run bitbake to find out the values of various
variables such as DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE; this assumption is incorrect for the
extensible SDK. To work around this, clear OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT in the
environment when running runqemu.
Fixes [YOCTO #10447].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
With recent changes to recipeutils, the list of local files returned
by get_recipe_local_files could possibly include source files. This
only happens when the recipe contains a SRC_URI using subdir= to put
files in the source tree. These files should be ignored when
populating the list of local files for oe-local-files directory.
[YOCTO #10326]
introduced in
OE-Core revision 9069fef5dad5a873c8a8f720f7bcbc7625556309
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Relying on that awk is installed on the target just to extract the
fourth column (i.e., the free volume size) from `df -P` is an
unnecessary dependency for devtool deploy-target. As it is already
using sed to mangle the output from `df -P`, this can easily be
modified to only extract the free volume size.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the user runs devtool add on an npm:// URL (or source tree that uses
node.js), and npm is not available, just build nodejs-native instead of
telling the user they need to do it; if that fails because there isn't
any such recipe (which would be the default, since it's not in OE-Core)
then produce a slightly more readable error message hinting at what the
user needs to do.
Note that this forces the use of nodejs-native rather than npm on the
host - this makes sense for two reasons: (1) we need it to be compatible
with nodejs for the target, and (2) we have to have a recipe for that
anyway, so allowing you to avoid having a recipe for the native version
isn't really beneficial.
There's a bit of a hack in here in order to allow this - for node.js
sources that aren't fetched via npm we don't know that they are that
until we've fetched and unpacked them, by which time we're inside
recipetool and have an active tinfoil instance that will prevent bitbake
being run. To avoid this being an issue, we allow recipetool to get to
the point where we know we need npm and then exit with a specific exit
code, at which point devtool can try to build it and then if that
succeeds, it will re-execute recipetool. This is definitely not ideal,
but it can't really be refactored and done properly until we do the
tinfoil2 refactoring; in the mean time though we still want to be
helpful to the user.
Fixes [YOCTO #10337].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We want to remove the -f/--fetch option at some point (as you can now
specify a URL as a positional argument instead) so display a warning
that it's deprecated if it is used.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We were supposed to be printing out the specified recipe name here but I
forgot to specify a parameter for the string.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Now that recipeutils.validate_pn() properly validates characters used in
the name, we can drop this bit checking for '/' since that's not
permitted by validate_pn(). (The FIXME comment here - that I myself
apparently wrote - is questionable since that function was clearly never
intended to allow '/', perhaps I was misled because it was broken and
did so).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
In keeping with making recipetool create / devtool add as easy to use as
possible, users shouldn't have to know how to reformat git short form ssh
URLs for consumption by BitBake's fetcher (for example
user@git.example.com:repo.git should be expressed as
git://user@git.example.com/repo.git;protocol=ssh ) - instead we should
just take care of that automatically. Add some logic in the appropriate
places to do that.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
It's rare but there are recipes that have individual files (as opposed
to archives) in SRC_URI using subdir= to put them under the source tree,
the examples in OE-Core being bzip2 and openssl. This broke devtool
update-recipe (and devtool finish) because the file wasn't unpacked into
the oe-local-files directory and thus when it came time to update the
recipe, the file was assumed to have been deleted by the user and thus
the file was erroneously removed. Add logic to handle these properly so
that this doesn't happen.
(We still have another potential problem in that these files become part
of the initial commit from upstream, which could be confusing because
they didn't come from there - but that's a separate issue and not one
that is trivially solved.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
We should always shut down tinfoil when we're finished with it, either
by explicitly calling the shutdown() method or by using it as a
context manager ("with ...").
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When using PATCHTOOL = "git", the user of the system is not really the
committer - it's the build system itself. Thus, specify "dummy" values
for username and email instead of using the user's configured values.
Various parts of the devtool code that need to make commits have also
been updated to use the same logic.
This allows PATCHTOOL = "git" and devtool to be used on systems where
git user.name / user.email has not been set (on versions of git where
it doesn't default a value under this circumstance).
If you want to return to the old behaviour where the externally
configured user name / email are used, set the following in your
local.conf:
PATCH_GIT_USER_NAME = ""
PATCH_GIT_USER_EMAIL = ""
Fixes [YOCTO #8703].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The missing split() causes dev and dbg packages to match.
Signed-off-by: Ola x Nilsson <ola.x.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The --wilcard-version flag was only used in the srcrev variant of the
update-recipe command.
Signed-off-by: Ola x Nilsson <ola.x.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
multi-configuration builds
Unfortunately to implenent multiconfig support in bitbake some APIs
had to change. This updates code in OE to match the changes in bitbake.
Its mostly periperhal changes around devtool/recipetool
[Will need a bitbake version requirement bump which I'll make when merging]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add a subcommand which will "finish" the work on a recipe. This is
effectively the same as update-recipe followed by reset, except that the
destination layer is required and it will do the right thing depending
on the situation - if the recipe file itself is in the workspace (e.g.
as a result of devtool add), the recipe file and any associated files
will be moved to the destination layer; or if the destination layer is
the one containing the original recipe, the recipe will be overwritten;
otherwise a bbappend will be created to apply the changes. In all cases
the layer path can be loosely specified - it could be a layer name, or
a partial path into a recipe. In the case of upgrades, devtool finish
will also take care of deleting the old recipe.
This avoids the user having to figure out the correct actions when
they're done - they just do "devtool finish recipename layername" and
it saves their work and then removes the recipe from the workspace.
Addresses [YOCTO #8594].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This provides us with the information we need to remove the original
version recipe and associated files when running "devtool finish" after
"devtool upgrade".
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This will be called by "devtool finish" to allow it to update the recipe
or create the bbappend depending on the destination.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This will be called by "devtool finish" to allow it to reset the recipe
at the end.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If there are files in the oe-local-files directory which are identical
to the original version, then we shouldn't be copying them to the
destination layer. This is particularly important when using the -a
option to create a bbappend.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
devtool update-recipe was defaulting to the ${BPN} named directory when
adding patches next to a recipe, but that meant if you already had files
in a ${BP} named directory (i.e. name and version) or "files" then you'd
end up with two directories next to the recipe, which is usually not
what you want. To avoid this, look through FILESPATH and take the first
one that's the same level or one level down from the recipe and already
exists, if any.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
It is currently possible to specify a file (e.g. a tarball) on the local
disk as the source, but you have to know to put file:// in front of it.
There's really no need to force users to jump through that hoop if they
really want to do this so check if the specified source is a file and
prefix it with file:// if that's the case.
Also ensure the same works for "devtool add" at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Certain recipes cannot be used with devtool extract / modify / upgrade -
usually because they don't provide any source. Return a specific exit
code (4) so that scripts such as scripts/contrib/devtool-stress.py know
the difference between this and a genuine failure.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
We were attempting to open the recipe file unconditionally here - we
need to account for the possibility that the recipe file has been
deleted or moved away by the user.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
In OE-Core revision 7baf57ad896112cf2258b3e2c2a1f8b756fb39bc I changed
the default update-recipe behaviour to only update patches for commits
that were changed; unfortunately I failed to handle the --initial-rev
option which was broken after that point. Rework how the initial
revision is passed in so that it now operates correctly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Allow specifying more than one recipe on the devtool reset command line.
Also tweak the help text slightly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Converted return value of items() keys() and values() to
lists when dictionary is modified in the loop and when
the result is added to the list.
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Moved call of decode('utf-8') as close as possible to
call of subprocess API to avoid calling it in a lot of
other places.
Decoded binary data to utf-8 where appropriate to fix devtool
and recipetool tests in python 3 environment.
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Python 3 doesn't have basestring type as all string
are unicode strings.
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Replaced iteritems -> items, itervalues -> values,
iterkeys -> keys or 'in'
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
|
|
xrange() no longer exists in python 3, use range()
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Iterators now return views, not lists in python3. Where we need
lists, handle this explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If fetching source from a git repository, typically within OpenEmbedded
we encourage setting SRCREV to a fixed revision, so change to do that by
default and add a -a/--autorev option to use "${AUTOREV}" instead.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The -S / --srcrev option must be specified if fetching from a git
repository, so spell that out in the help text.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Make a couple of changes to the rebase operation:
1) Only wrap the actual rebase command in try...except since a failure
in any of the other commands should be an error, not a warning
2) If it's a conflict (which unfortunately we can only tell by checking
for the keyword "conflict" since git doesn't return error codes based
on the type of error) then print a message clarifying that the user
needs to resolve the issue themselves to finish the upgrade.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The gdb recipe in OE-Core has an inc file with the version in it;
since the inc file is pulled in with a "require ${PV}.inc", when
upgrading the recipe we need to also rename the inc file it will fail to
parse and the upgrade itself will fail.
Fixes [YOCTO #9574].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Having two code paths here makes maintenance difficult, and it doesn't
seem likely that you would use the local case in real usage anyway, so
drop the local support entirely.
This should allow us to resolve [YOCTO #9301].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If an image with the filename foo.bb could be built using the name "bar"
instead, then build-sdk would fail to create the derivative sdk.
This was because the code assumed that the file name matched the target,
which is not necessarily the case.
Signed-off-by: Randy Witt <randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM changes over an SDK update, bitbake within the
extensible SDK will be broken because it will see that the matching
uninative tarball doesn't exist and if there is a default value of
UNINATIVE_URL it will attempt to download the file and will then fail
because the checksums don't match up; alternatively if no UNINATIVE_URL
is set then it'll also fail with an error about misconfiguration. To fix
this, add some logic to devtool sdk-update to download the matching
uninative tarball(s) for the checksum(s) in the newly fetched SDK
configuration.
Fixes [YOCTO #9301].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
Paul Eggleton
Jiajie Hu
Stephano Cetola
Peter Kjellerstedt
Ola x Nilsson
Richard Purdie
Ed Bartosh
Randy Witt