summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta/recipes-core/busybox/files/CVE-2021-423xx-awk.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-core/busybox/files/CVE-2021-423xx-awk.patch')
-rw-r--r--meta/recipes-core/busybox/files/CVE-2021-423xx-awk.patch215
1 files changed, 215 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/busybox/files/CVE-2021-423xx-awk.patch b/meta/recipes-core/busybox/files/CVE-2021-423xx-awk.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..7e3d47b88c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/busybox/files/CVE-2021-423xx-awk.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+From a21708eb8d07b4a6dbc1d3e4ace4c5721515a84c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sana Kazi <Sana.Kazi@kpit.com>
+Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:25:34 +0530
+Subject: [PATCH] busybox: Fix multiple security issues in awk
+
+Description: fix multiple security issues in awk
+Origin: backported awk.c from busybox 1.34.1
+
+CVE: CVE-2021-42378
+CVE: CVE-2021-42379
+CVE: CVE-2021-42380
+CVE: CVE-2021-42381
+CVE: CVE-2021-42382
+CVE: CVE-2021-42384
+CVE: CVE-2021-42385
+CVE: CVE-2021-42386
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/busybox/1:1.30.1-6ubuntu3.1/busybox_1.30.1-6ubuntu3.1.debian.tar.xz]
+
+Comment: Refreshed first hunk and removed few hunks as they are already present in source.
+
+Signed-off-by: Sana Kazi <Sana.Kazi@kpit.com>
+Signed-off-by: Ranjitsinh Rathod <Ranjitsinh.Rathod@kpit.com>
+
+---
+ editors/awk.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
+ 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/editors/awk.c b/editors/awk.c
+index d25508e..4e4f282 100644
+--- a/editors/awk.c
++++ b/editors/awk.c
+@@ -272,7 +272,8 @@ typedef struct tsplitter_s {
+ /* if previous token class is CONCAT1 and next is CONCAT2, concatenation */
+ /* operator is inserted between them */
+ #define TC_CONCAT1 (TC_VARIABLE | TC_ARRTERM | TC_SEQTERM \
+- | TC_STRING | TC_NUMBER | TC_UOPPOST)
++ | TC_STRING | TC_NUMBER | TC_UOPPOST \
++ | TC_LENGTH)
+ #define TC_CONCAT2 (TC_OPERAND | TC_UOPPRE)
+
+ #define OF_RES1 0x010000
+@@ -404,7 +405,7 @@ static const char tokenlist[] ALIGN1 =
+
+ #define OC_B OC_BUILTIN
+
+-static const uint32_t tokeninfo[] = {
++static const uint32_t tokeninfo[] ALIGN4 = {
+ 0,
+ 0,
+ OC_REGEXP,
+@@ -1070,8 +1071,10 @@ static uint32_t next_token(uint32_t expected)
+ const uint32_t *ti;
+
+ if (t_rollback) {
++ debug_printf_parse("%s: using rolled-back token\n", __func__);
+ t_rollback = FALSE;
+ } else if (concat_inserted) {
++ debug_printf_parse("%s: using concat-inserted token\n", __func__);
+ concat_inserted = FALSE;
+ t_tclass = save_tclass;
+ t_info = save_info;
+@@ -1200,7 +1203,11 @@ static uint32_t next_token(uint32_t expected)
+ goto readnext;
+
+ /* insert concatenation operator when needed */
+- if ((ltclass & TC_CONCAT1) && (tc & TC_CONCAT2) && (expected & TC_BINOP)) {
++ debug_printf_parse("%s: %x %x %x concat_inserted?\n", __func__,
++ (ltclass & TC_CONCAT1), (tc & TC_CONCAT2), (expected & TC_BINOP));
++ if ((ltclass & TC_CONCAT1) && (tc & TC_CONCAT2) && (expected & TC_BINOP)
++ && !(ltclass == TC_LENGTH && tc == TC_SEQSTART) /* but not for "length(..." */
++ ) {
+ concat_inserted = TRUE;
+ save_tclass = tc;
+ save_info = t_info;
+@@ -1208,6 +1215,7 @@ static uint32_t next_token(uint32_t expected)
+ t_info = OC_CONCAT | SS | P(35);
+ }
+
++ debug_printf_parse("%s: t_tclass=tc=%x\n", __func__, t_tclass);
+ t_tclass = tc;
+ }
+ ltclass = t_tclass;
+@@ -1218,6 +1226,7 @@ static uint32_t next_token(uint32_t expected)
+ EMSG_UNEXP_EOS : EMSG_UNEXP_TOKEN);
+ }
+
++ debug_printf_parse("%s: returning, ltclass:%x t_double:%f\n", __func__, ltclass, t_double);
+ return ltclass;
+ #undef concat_inserted
+ #undef save_tclass
+@@ -1282,7 +1291,7 @@ static node *parse_expr(uint32_t iexp)
+ glptr = NULL;
+
+ } else if (tc & (TC_BINOP | TC_UOPPOST)) {
+- debug_printf_parse("%s: TC_BINOP | TC_UOPPOST\n", __func__);
++ debug_printf_parse("%s: TC_BINOP | TC_UOPPOST tc:%x\n", __func__, tc);
+ /* for binary and postfix-unary operators, jump back over
+ * previous operators with higher priority */
+ vn = cn;
+@@ -1350,8 +1359,10 @@ static node *parse_expr(uint32_t iexp)
+ v = cn->l.v = xzalloc(sizeof(var));
+ if (tc & TC_NUMBER)
+ setvar_i(v, t_double);
+- else
++ else {
+ setvar_s(v, t_string);
++ xtc &= ~TC_UOPPOST; /* "str"++ is not allowed */
++ }
+ break;
+
+ case TC_REGEXP:
+@@ -1387,7 +1398,12 @@ static node *parse_expr(uint32_t iexp)
+
+ case TC_LENGTH:
+ debug_printf_parse("%s: TC_LENGTH\n", __func__);
+- next_token(TC_SEQSTART | TC_OPTERM | TC_GRPTERM);
++ next_token(TC_SEQSTART /* length(...) */
++ | TC_OPTERM /* length; (or newline)*/
++ | TC_GRPTERM /* length } */
++ | TC_BINOPX /* length <op> NUM */
++ | TC_COMMA /* print length, 1 */
++ );
+ rollback_token();
+ if (t_tclass & TC_SEQSTART) {
+ /* It was a "(" token. Handle just like TC_BUILTIN */
+@@ -1747,12 +1763,34 @@ static void fsrealloc(int size)
+ nfields = size;
+ }
+
++static int regexec1_nonempty(const regex_t *preg, const char *s, regmatch_t pmatch[])
++{
++ int r = regexec(preg, s, 1, pmatch, 0);
++ if (r == 0 && pmatch[0].rm_eo == 0) {
++ /* For example, happens when FS can match
++ * an empty string (awk -F ' *'). Logically,
++ * this should split into one-char fields.
++ * However, gawk 5.0.1 searches for first
++ * _non-empty_ separator string match:
++ */
++ size_t ofs = 0;
++ do {
++ ofs++;
++ if (!s[ofs])
++ return REG_NOMATCH;
++ regexec(preg, s + ofs, 1, pmatch, 0);
++ } while (pmatch[0].rm_eo == 0);
++ pmatch[0].rm_so += ofs;
++ pmatch[0].rm_eo += ofs;
++ }
++ return r;
++}
++
+ static int awk_split(const char *s, node *spl, char **slist)
+ {
+- int l, n;
++ int n;
+ char c[4];
+ char *s1;
+- regmatch_t pmatch[2]; // TODO: why [2]? [1] is enough...
+
+ /* in worst case, each char would be a separate field */
+ *slist = s1 = xzalloc(strlen(s) * 2 + 3);
+@@ -1769,29 +1807,31 @@ static int awk_split(const char *s, node *spl, char **slist)
+ return n; /* "": zero fields */
+ n++; /* at least one field will be there */
+ do {
++ int l;
++ regmatch_t pmatch[2]; // TODO: why [2]? [1] is enough...
++
+ l = strcspn(s, c+2); /* len till next NUL or \n */
+- if (regexec(icase ? spl->r.ire : spl->l.re, s, 1, pmatch, 0) == 0
++ if (regexec1_nonempty(icase ? spl->r.ire : spl->l.re, s, pmatch) == 0
+ && pmatch[0].rm_so <= l
+ ) {
++ /* if (pmatch[0].rm_eo == 0) ... - impossible */
+ l = pmatch[0].rm_so;
+- if (pmatch[0].rm_eo == 0) {
+- l++;
+- pmatch[0].rm_eo++;
+- }
+ n++; /* we saw yet another delimiter */
+ } else {
+ pmatch[0].rm_eo = l;
+ if (s[l])
+ pmatch[0].rm_eo++;
+ }
+- memcpy(s1, s, l);
+- /* make sure we remove *all* of the separator chars */
+- do {
+- s1[l] = '\0';
+- } while (++l < pmatch[0].rm_eo);
+- nextword(&s1);
++ s1 = mempcpy(s1, s, l);
++ *s1++ = '\0';
+ s += pmatch[0].rm_eo;
+ } while (*s);
++
++ /* echo a-- | awk -F-- '{ print NF, length($NF), $NF }'
++ * should print "2 0 ":
++ */
++ *s1 = '\0';
++
+ return n;
+ }
+ if (c[0] == '\0') { /* null split */
+@@ -1995,7 +2035,7 @@ static int ptest(node *pattern)
+ static int awk_getline(rstream *rsm, var *v)
+ {
+ char *b;
+- regmatch_t pmatch[2];
++ regmatch_t pmatch[2]; // TODO: why [2]? [1] is enough...
+ int size, a, p, pp = 0;
+ int fd, so, eo, r, rp;
+ char c, *m, *s;