diff options
| author |   Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2012-01-13 16:23:26 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2012-01-13 16:56:20 +0000 |
| commit | bd047935305c872b565f30b46c94b7077e5fb3a2 (patch) | |
| tree | 988cebf07b7de0be0e30cee916d0987fea2e24f5 /meta/classes/patch.bbclass | |
| parent | 1d2697e6f00cc3771f39f5a7d4384a22d9696b16 (diff) | |
| download | openembedded-core-bd047935305c872b565f30b46c94b7077e5fb3a2.tar.gz | |
patch.bbclass: Ensure the DATE and SRCDATE variable exclusions apply to the correct function
People have noticed that sstate is now getting invalidated very readily. The
issue is that the code using these variables was factored into a new function
but the variable exclusion was not. This patch moves the variable exclusion
to the correct place allowing the sstate checksums to work correctly.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/classes/patch.bbclass')
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/classes/patch.bbclass | 4 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/meta/classes/patch.bbclass b/meta/classes/patch.bbclass index 335d02ec71..471c32bce2 100644 --- a/meta/classes/patch.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/patch.bbclass @@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ def should_apply(parm, d): return True, None +should_apply[vardepsexclude] = "DATE SRCDATE" + python patch_do_patch() { import oe.patch @@ -155,7 +157,7 @@ python patch_do_patch() { bb.fatal(str(exc)) resolver.Resolve() } -patch_do_patch[vardepsexclude] = "DATE SRCDATE PATCHRESOLVE" +patch_do_patch[vardepsexclude] = "PATCHRESOLVE" addtask patch after do_unpack do_patch[dirs] = "${WORKDIR}" |