| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
LSB as a standard isn't current and isn't well suited to embedded
anyway. Its putting artifical constraints on the system and with modern
layer technology, would now be better off as its own layer. As such
its time to split it out.
The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release,
which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release
package.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
${base_prefix} is set in bitbake.conf to empty. This makes lsb_release
always install under /bin which is a problem if usrmerge is in
DISTRO_FEATURES, because it needs to be installed under /usr/bin.
By using ${root_prefix} instead, we fix the usrmerge install path and
the following QA warning goes away while keeping the non-usrmerge path
identical.
WARNING: lsb-5.0-r0 do_package: QA Issue: lsb: Files/directories were
installed but not shipped in any package:
/bin
/bin/lsb_release
Please set FILES such that these items are packaged. Alternatively
if they are unneeded, avoid installing them or delete them within do_install.
lsb: 2 installed and not shipped files. [installed-vs-shipped]
Also if usrmerge is defined don't try to create the lib64 symlink
because base-files handles it to avoid the do_rootfs error
Collected errors:
* check_data_file_clashes: Package lsb wants to install file
tmp-glibc/work/x64-nilrt-linux/test-image/1.0-r0/rootfs/lib64
But that file is already provided by package * base-files
Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The LSB test packages had been updated to 5.0 in lsbtest. We also need
to bump to version 5.0 for this recipe.
Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
Adrian Bunk
Ioan-Adrian Ratiu
Yi Zhao